Google to US Government: Open The Airwaves Or We'll Buy Them. All of Them.
Google demanded today that the US Government agree that use of the public wireless spectrum be subject to the following four rules, meant to require the airwaves be "open".
- Open applications: consumers should be able to download and utilize any software applications, content, or services they desire;
- Open devices: consumers should be able to utilize their handheld communications device with whatever wireless network they prefer;
- Open services: third parties (resellers) should be able to acquire wireless services from a 700 MHz licensee on a wholesale basis, based on reasonably nondiscriminatory commercial terms; and
- Open networks: third parties (like Internet service providers) should be able to interconnect at any technically feasible point in a 700 MHz licensee's wireless network.
Fair enough. Google isn't a phone company, is sad that the phone and cable companies want to charge for their networks, so they want Uncle Sam to demand that Google be allowed to play with the big boys. Since Uncle Sam granted the monopolies the phone and cable companies are abusing, I say this is all good.
But the kicker, and it's an amazing kicker, is that Google is willing to pay the government $4.6 billion if they agree to its terms.
That's why our CEO Eric Schmidt today sent a letter to FCC Chairman Kevin Martin, saying that, should the FCC adopt all four license conditions requested above, Google intends to commit at least $4.6 billion to bidding for spectrum in the upcoming 700 Mhz auction.
Why $4.6 billion? While we think that a robust and competitive auction based on these four principles will likely produce much higher bids, and we are eager to see a diverse set of bidders competing, $4.6 billion is the reserve price that FCC has proposed for the auction. With any concerns about revenue to the U.S. Treasury being satisfied, we hope the FCC can return its attention to adopting openness principles for the benefit of consumers.
I think the obvious question is as follows: If Google is willing to spend $4.6b to encourage the government to adopt its standards, what is it willing to spend to buy the whole spectrum and force its way if the government disagrees? And will it—can it—outspend the phone companies to get its way? And if they do get their way, will they still "do no evil?"
It's a bold move. That's a lot of money, even for Google. But it doesn't seem quite subtle enough to work. Would the commissioners FCC rather do the "right" thing under such naked, public threats by such an arrogant company, or slide a deal in the backdoor while receiving some nice golfing trips, fine meals, cash in a freezer, and evening entertainment?

2 Comments:
Google never ceases to amaze me... just when I'm convinced they're a bloated, omni-present extension of big brother who's hell bent on indexing everything about me and turning it over to the government, they turn around and pull one of these maneuvers.
As much as a distrust Google (they've repeatedly demonstrated that they are willing commit acts of "evil" at our expense to help oppresive government who offer them access lucrative markets), I trust them more than I trust our friendly telecomm monopolies.
It's just a sad state of affairs when private companies have to bribe/bully the government into doing its job--looking out for the public trust.
I doubt Google has the resources to go head-to-head with the telecomms, but perhaps they can build a coalition of companies that have a vested interest in breaking into this industry on their own terms instead of the big-boy's terms...
If only we could convince the corporate overlords that an investment like this would open up a whole new market to exploit consumers, we could get something that we've never seen in the US... real competition in the wireless industry. Imagine--exploiting consumers and the public good being one and the same for a change.
Some interesting developments on this.
FCC approved rules that would allow customers to use whatever phone and softwre they want on a portion of the networks.
Looks like Google scored a partial victory...
NY Times article:
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/01/technology/01spectrum.html?ex=1343620800&en=ea558b72f8b5767a&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home